This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on ISI (2)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Medical Ethics  • Alert me on articles by topic

Return to the Commons?

Christine K. Cassel, MD; Troyen E. Brennan, MD, JD

JAMA. 2007;297:2518-2521.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The inexorable increase in health care costs, seemingly impervious to most market-based attempts at amelioration, has led to a growing interest in measuring efficiency of health care as a key component of quality of care.¹ Although there have been creative attempts by the insurance industry to develop meaningful efficiency measures, physicians are suspicious that payers are concerned only about the cost component and not about the quality component when measuring efficiency.² But, in addition to questions about the method and accuracy of measurements of efficiency, an underlying set of concerns have been expressed by the physician sector of the health care provider community regarding their role in managing health care resources, concerns that stem from the deep and profound roots of medical ethics.

The Physician's Charter on Medical Professionalism maintains that among other responsibilities, physicians must be committed to managing medical . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Ethics of the Medical Commons

Author Affiliations: American Board of Internal Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (Dr Cassel) and Aetna Inc, Hartford, Conn (Dr Brennan).

RELATED ARTICLE

Why Well-Insured Patients Should Demand Value-Based Insurance Benefits
Colleen C. Denny, Ezekiel J. Emanuel, and Steven D. Pearson
JAMA. 2007;297(22):2515-2518.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT