You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 297 No. 3, January 17, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology
 •Breast Cancer
 •Rheumatology
 •Osteoporosis
 •Women's Health
 •Women's Health, Other
 •Drug Therapy
 •Adverse Effects
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Raloxifene vs Tamoxifen

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Dr Vogel and colleagues1 reported the results of the Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) P-2 trial. I was disappointed that in the accompanying Editorial, Drs Gradishar and Cella2 did not comment on the role of the effects of raloxifene on the breast when choosing an agent to treat a patient with osteoporosis or osteopenia who has breast cancer risk factors. The MORE3 and CORE4 trials, while not performed on a group at high risk for breast cancer, showed a significant reduction in new-onset breast cancer. This may not be widely known because raloxifene is not approved for any breast indication.

Gradishar and Cella state that "decision making for an individual patient who is considering a preventive agent to reduce the risk of breast cancer must also take into account other health issues that may very well outweigh the risk of developing breast cancer." I would further . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Steven R. Goldstein, MD
steven.goldstein@med.nyu.edu
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
New York University School of Medicine
New York



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTER

Raloxifene vs Tamoxifen—Reply
William J. Gradishar and David Cella
JAMA. 2007;297(3):264.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

Effects of Tamoxifen vs Raloxifene on the Risk of Developing Invasive Breast Cancer and Other Disease Outcomes: The NSABP Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) P-2 Trial
Victor G. Vogel, Joseph P. Costantino, D. Lawrence Wickerham, Walter M. Cronin, Reena S. Cecchini, James N. Atkins, Therese B. Bevers, Louis Fehrenbacher, Eduardo R. Pajon, Jr, James L. Wade, III, André Robidoux, Richard G. Margolese, Joan James, Scott M. Lippman, Carolyn D. Runowicz, Patricia A. Ganz, Steven E. Reis, Worta McCaskill-Stevens, Leslie G. Ford, V. Craig Jordan, Norman Wolmark, and for the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP)
JAMA. 2006;295(23):2727-2741.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.