 |
|
Estimating Treatment Effects Using Observational Data
Ralph B. D’Agostino, Jr, PhD;
Ralph B. D’Agostino, Sr, PhD
JAMA. 2007;297:314-316.
|
|
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
|
|
The randomized clinical trial (RCT) is the ideal method for measuring treatment effects. Participants in clinical trials are randomly assigned to a treatment or control group. Randomization reduces biases by making treatment and control groups "equal with respect to all features," except the treatment assignment. When randomization is performed correctly, differences in efficacy found by statistical comparisons can be attributed to the difference between the treatment and control.1
However, the RCT does not necessarily provide the final answer to treatment effectiveness, as there are many restrictions that limit generalizability. For example, RCTs are often restricted to patients with limited disease, comorbidity, and concomitant medications. Thus, RCTs generally demonstrate efficacy rather than effectiveness, where efficacy is the treatment effect under the restricted conditions of the RCT and effectiveness is the treatment effect under the conditions of usual practice.1
Observational, nonrandomized studies . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Author Affiliations: Department of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC (Dr D’Agostino, Jr); and Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Boston University, and Harvard Clinical Research Institute, Boston, Mass (Dr D’Agostino, Sr).
RELATED LETTERS
Using Observational Data to Estimate Treatment Effects
Therese A. Stukel, Elliott S. Fisher, and David E. Wennberg
JAMA. 2007;297(19):2078-2079.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Using Observational Data to Estimate Treatment Effects—Reply
Ralph B. D’Agostino, Jr and Ralph B. D’Agostino, Sr
JAMA. 2007;297(19):2079.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED ARTICLE
Analysis of Observational Studies in the Presence of Treatment Selection Bias: Effects of Invasive Cardiac Management on AMI Survival Using Propensity Score and Instrumental Variable Methods
Thérèse A. Stukel, Elliott S. Fisher, David E. Wennberg, David A. Alter, Daniel J. Gottlieb, and Marian J. Vermeulen
JAMA. 2007;297(3):278-285.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
IS IT TIME TO USE OBSERVATIONAL DATA TO ESTIMATE TREATMENT EFFECTIVENESS IN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS?
Wilkins and Trojano
Neurology 2008;71:463-464.
FULL TEXT
Randomized Clinical Trials and Observational Studies: Guidelines for Assessing Respective Strengths and Limitations
Hannan
J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2008;1:211-217.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Effects of LifeSkills Training on Medical Students' Performance in Dealing with Complex Clinical Cases
Campo et al.
Acad. Psychiatry 2008;32:188-193.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Evidence from Nonrandomized Studies: A Case Study on the Estimation of Causal Effects
Schmoor et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2008;167:1120-1129.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Fall-Related Hospitalization and Facility Costs Among Residents of Institutions Providing Long-Term Care
Carroll et al.
Gerontologist 2008;48:213-222.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
"Off-label" stent therapy 2-year comparison of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents.
Applegate et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:607-614.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Assessing the safety of drugs through observational research
Simpson
Heart 2008;94:129-130.
FULL TEXT
Drug-Eluting Stents vs. Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting in Multivessel Coronary Disease
Hannan et al.
NEJM 2008;358:331-341.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Analytic Approaches to Observational Studies With Treatment Selection Bias
Novikov and Kalter-Leibovici
JAMA 2007;297:2077-2077.
FULL TEXT
Using Observational Data to Estimate Treatment Effects
Stukel et al.
JAMA 2007;297:2078-2079.
FULL TEXT
Observational studies should carry a health warning
BMJ 2007;334:179-179.
FULL TEXT
|
