You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 297 No. 5, February 7, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Public Health, Other
 •Health Policy
 •Medical Practice, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Potential Health and Economic Consequences of Misplaced Priorities

Steven H. Woolf, MD, MPH

JAMA. 2007;297:523-526.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To maximize the health of its citizens, society should pursue interventions in proportion to the ability of those interventions to improve outcomes. All else being equal, a strategy that is more effective than its alternative should receive more, not less, attention. Doing otherwise can compromise the health of patients. For example, if intervention A is 10 times more effective than intervention B in reducing mortality, performing more of B than A will allow more deaths to occur. Just as errors of omission cause harm, inattention to how priorities are balanced can indirectly claim lives, contribute to disease, and generate costs that would not occur if priorities were in greater harmony with potential gains.

The "silo" mentality that pervades so much of clinical practice and policy in the United States often finds decision makers focusing their attention and resources on a specific patient or disease—any one . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Choosing Effective Services

Author Affiliations: Departments of Family Medicine, Epidemiology, and Community Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.


RELATED LETTERS

Priorities to Improve Health Outcomes
John Kvasnicka
JAMA. 2007;297(21):2346.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Priorities to Improve Health Outcomes—Reply
Steven H. Woolf
JAMA. 2007;297(21):2346-2347.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Ethical Implications of Active Surveillance Cultures and Contact Precautions for Controlling Multidrug Resistant Organisms in the Hospital Setting
Edmond et al.
Public Health Ethics 2008;0:phn014v1-phn014.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Invited Article: Neurology and quality improvement: An introduction
Bever et al.
Neurology 2008;70:1636-1640.
FULL TEXT  

The Meaning of Translational Research and Why It Matters
Woolf
JAMA 2008;299:211-213.
FULL TEXT  

We Can Do Better -- Improving the Health of the American People
Schroeder
NEJM 2007;357:1221-1228.
FULL TEXT  

Priorities to Improve Health Outcomes
Kvasnicka
JAMA 2007;297:2346-2346.
FULL TEXT  

In This Issue: Real Change Is Real Hard in the Real World
Stange and Phillips
Ann Fam Med 2007;5:98-100.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.