You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 297 No. 6, February 14, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Medical Ethics
 •Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care
 •Patient-Physician Communication
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Access to Health Care Records After Death

Balancing Confidentiality With Appropriate Disclosure

David J. Robinson, MRCPI; Desmond O’Neill, MD, FRCPI

JAMA. 2007;297:634-636.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The concept of confidentiality in the patient-physician relationship has existed for millennia and is enshrined in both ancient and modern1 codes of ethics. Although most ethical codes stipulate that the duty to maintain confidentiality extends beyond death, there is rarely any such provision in statutory law. This may lead to uncertainty about how to treat information given in confidence to health professionals during life when access to that information is requested after death. Confidentiality is never an absolute and is usually qualified by the need to protect society or third parties. Confidentiality may be assumed to be good in itself or defended on grounds of autonomy or utilitarianism—if patients cannot trust their physicians, the relationship becomes unworkable.

As society changes and technology evolves, the situation after death becomes more complex, with jurists and ethicists proposing a variety of positions. One extreme of . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: Department of Medical Gerontology, Adelaide and Meath Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Confidentiality of Medical Information After Death
Robert M. Sade
JAMA. 2007;297(23):2585.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Confidentiality of Medical Information After Death—Reply
David J. Robinson and Desmond O'Neill
JAMA. 2007;297(23):2585.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

To protect or to publish: confidentiality and the fate of the mentally ill victims of Nazi euthanasia
Strous
J. Med. Ethics 2009;35:361-364.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Confidentiality of Medical Information After Death
Sade
JAMA 2007;297:2585-2585.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.