You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 297 No. 7, February 21, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (10)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Medical Practice, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Pay-for-Performance

Will the Latest Payment Trend Improve Care?

Meredith B. Rosenthal, PhD; R. Adams Dudley, MD, MBA

JAMA. 2007;297:740-744.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Pay-for-performance programs are now firmly ensconced in the payment systems of US public and private insurers across the spectrum. More than half of commercial health maintenance organizations are using pay-for-performance, and recent legislation requires Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to adopt this approach for Medicare.1 As commercial programs have evolved during the last 5 years, the categories of providers (clinicians, hospitals, and other health care facilities), numbers of measures, and dollar amounts at risk have increased. In addition, acceptance of performance measurement among physicians and organized medicine has broadened, with the American Medical Association committing to the US Congress in February 2006 that it would develop more than 100 performance measures by the end of 2006.2

To date, widespread experimentation has yielded important lessons and highlighted critical challenges to paying for performance. Several recently published evaluations have demonstrated both . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Five Key Design Elements of Pay-for-Performance

Author Affiliations: Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass (Dr Rosenthal); and Department of Medicine and Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco (Dr Dudley).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Comparison of Change in Quality of Care Between Safety-Net and Non-Safety-Net Hospitals
Werner et al.
JAMA 2008;299:2180-2187.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Estimating Physician Effects on Glycemic Control in the Treatment of Diabetes: Methods, effects sizes, and implications for treatment policy
Tuerk et al.
Diabetes Care 2008;31:869-873.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Who Is Accountable for Racial Equity in Health Care?
Blustein
JAMA 2008;299:814-816.
FULL TEXT  

What Is Different About the Market for Health Care?
Wells et al.
JAMA 2007;298:2785-2787.
FULL TEXT  

Is P4P Really FFS?
Wodchis et al.
JAMA 2007;298:1797-1799.
FULL TEXT  

Performance Measures in Neuroradiology
Seidenwurm et al.
Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2007;28:1435-1438.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

For Love, for Money, or for Both?: Which Way Will We Choose to Transform Children's Health Care?
Homer
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2007;161:715-717.
FULL TEXT  

Pay for performance: learning about quality
Bell and Levinson
CMAJ 2007;176:1717-1719.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.