You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 298 No. 11, September 19, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (4)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Essential Elements of a Technology and Outcomes Assessment Initiative

Ezekiel J. Emanuel, MD, PhD; Victor R. Fuchs, PhD; Alan M. Garber, MD, PhD

JAMA. 2007;298:1323-1325.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The mismatch between US health expenditures and the resources devoted to learning which health interventions are most effective is both striking and unwise. Each year US individuals spend more than $2 trillion on health care.1 More than $100 billion is spent for research and development and for regulatory approval of new technologies. Yet total spending on technology assessment almost certainly falls short of $1 billion per year—0.05% of all US health care spending.

Some of the $2 trillion in health care expenditures buys services of little or no value. This waste has been attributed to misleading advertisements, media hype, misguided state and federal mandates, fear of malpractice litigation, misaligned reimbursement incentives, and generous insurance that encourages patients to ignore the cost of services.2-4 Efforts to curb the inappropriate use of medical technologies, however, can have only . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Essential Elements of an Effective Medical Technology and Outcomes Assessment Initiative

Author Affiliations: Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (Dr Emanuel); Department of Economics (Dr Fuchs) and Center for Health Policy (Dr Garber), Stanford University, Palo Alto, California; and VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California (Dr Garber).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Economic Evaluations of Medical Care Interventions for Cancer Patients: How, Why, and What Does it Mean?
Shih and Halpern
CA Cancer J Clin 2008;58:231-244.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Menu without Prices
Garber
ANN INTERN MED 2008;148:964-966.
FULL TEXT  

Information on Cost-Effectiveness: An Essential Product of a National Comparative Effectiveness Program
American College of Physicians
ANN INTERN MED 2008;148:956-961.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Technology Assessment and Adoption in Orthopaedics: Lessons Learned
Bozic and Jacobs
JBJS 2008;90:689-690.
FULL TEXT  

Do you approve of spending $300 million on HPV vaccination?: NO
Lippman et al.
cfp 2008;54:175-177.
FULL TEXT  

Approuvez-vous les 300 M $ pour la vaccination contre le VPH?: NON
Lippman et al.
cfp 2008;54:179-181.
FULL TEXT  

Predicting Benefit for Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Use--Reply
Redberg
JAMA 2008;299:287-287.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.