 |
 |

Malaria Treatment in the United States
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To the Editor: In their review of the treatment of malaria in the United States, Dr Griffith and colleagues1 provided a concise summary for clinicians who infrequently encounter malaria. While the information is important, they propose that the second question to be asked when managing malaria is "What is the parasite density?" Although there is an association between the peripheral parasite count and patient outcome, it is a relatively weak one. Other clinical and laboratory variables have stronger prognostic value, particularly acidosis and pulmonary and renal disease.2 In an international trial, almost 70% of 1050 severe malaria patients had a peripheral parasite count of less than 5%, and the mortality in this population was 18%.3 Emphasis on a "low" parasite count, rather than disease manifestations, may offer the clinician false reassurance or lead to an underestimation of the contribution of the malaria infection to a patient's symptoms.
The central pathophysiological . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Josh P. Hanson, FRACP
joshua.hanson@fmc.sa.gov.au Flinders Medical Centre Adelaide, Australia
Arjen M. Dondorp, MD, PhD;
Nick P. J. Day, MD, PhD
Faculty of Tropical Medicine Mahidol University Bangkok, Thailand
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati
What's this?
RELATED LETTER
Malaria Treatment in the United States—Reply
Monica E. Parise, Kevin Griffith, Sonja Mali, and Linda Lewis
JAMA. 2007;298(12):1396-1397.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED ARTICLE
Treatment of Malaria in the United States: A Systematic Review
Kevin S. Griffith, Linda S. Lewis, Sonja Mali, and Monica E. Parise
JAMA. 2007;297(20):2264-2277.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
79-Year-Old Man With Fever, Malaise, and Jaundice
Kreuziger et al.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84:281-284.
FULL TEXT
|