 |
 |

Validity of Reported Genetic Risk Factors for Acute Coronary Syndrome—Reply
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
In Reply: We note that all writers indicated broad agreement with our conclusion of the need for robust validation of genetic risk factors to provide convincing evidence that a true genetic risk factor has been identified. We agree with the comments of Dr Feero and colleagues that unbiased studies of whole genome association are likely to lead to important discoveries. Recent findings have illustrated the power of this approach and underscore the frequent need for large sample sizes and replication cohorts to achieve meaningful and convincing results.1-5 Of interest is that the variants identified in these studies show consistent replication of the identical alleles in diverse cohorts.
Dr Bochud and colleagues point out pitfalls in case-control studies. Our study's aim was to investigate whether previously reported genetic risk factors could be replicated in a large cohort of patients similar to those encountered in clinical practice. Our null results provide little . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Thomas M. Morgan, MD
morgan_t@kids.wustl.edu Washington University School of Medicine St Louis, Missouri
Harlan M. Krumholz, MD, MS;
Richard P. Lifton, MD, PhD
Yale University School of Medicine New Haven, Connecticut
John A. Spertus, MD, MPH
Mid America Heart Institute Kansas City, Missouri
|