This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (20)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related letters  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Quality of Care  • Quality of Care, Other  • Statistics and Research Methods  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Peter J. Pronovost, MD, PhD; Marlene Miller, MD, MSc; Robert M. Wachter, MD

JAMA. 2007;298:1800-1802.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Catalyzed by evidence of poor-quality care and remarkable variations in processes and outcomes, the interest in quality measurement has increased exponentially. Manifestations of this interest include widespread promulgation of quality measures, an increase in public reporting of these measures, and early experiments in paying for quality.^1-2 Now that quality of care is being measured rather than assumed, there seems little doubt that better quality scores will lead to major competitive advantages for clinicians and organizations.

Although many quality measures are used internally by health care organizations to improve quality of care, an increasing number of measures are being reported publicly. Yet the measurement of quality in health care is neither standardized nor consistently accurate and reliable. Because any organization or company can advertise the quality of its products, it is important to hold health care quality measures . . . [Full Text of this Article]

The Science of Quality Measurement and Reporting

Author Affiliations: Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine (Dr Pronovost) and Pediatrics (Dr Miller), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; and Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (Dr Wachter).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Accounting Principles and Measuring Health Care Quality
Dev Jayaraman and Howard Rivenson
JAMA. 2008;299(7):764.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Accounting Principles and Measuring Health Care Quality—Reply
Peter J. Pronovost, Marlene Miller, and Robert M. Wachter
JAMA. 2008;299(7):764-765.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Full Implementation of Computerized Physician Order Entry and Medication-Related Quality Outcomes: A Study of 3364 Hospitals
Yu et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2009;24:278-286.
ABSTRACT  

Transformation of Health Care at the Front Line
Conway and Clancy
JAMA 2009;301:763-765.
FULL TEXT  

Framework for Patient Safety Research and Improvement
Pronovost et al.
Circulation 2009;119:330-337.
FULL TEXT  

Public Reporting of Quality Data for Stroke: Is It Measuring Quality?
Kelly et al.
Stroke 2008;39:3367-3371.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Choosing The Best Hospital: The Limitations Of Public Quality Reporting
Rothberg et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2008;27:1680-1687.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Variation in subfertility care measured by guideline-based performance indicators
Mourad et al.
Hum Reprod 2008;23:2493-2500.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Accounting Principles and Measuring Health Care Quality
Jayaraman and Rivenson
JAMA 2008;299:764-764.
FULL TEXT