You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 298 No. 2, July 11, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care
 •Treatment Adherence
 •Obesity
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Women's Health
 •Women's Health, Other
 •Diet
 •Drug Therapy
 •Adherence
 •Hypertension
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Comparison of Weight-Loss Diets

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: In 1968, Grande1 critically reviewed purported weight and body composition effects of 3 weight reduction diets by invoking the laws of thermodynamics. Grande showed inconsistencies that rendered the publications inconclusive. Four decades later, serious data inconsistencies are still appearing in studies of diet intervention, such as the A TO Z Weight Loss Study by Dr Gardner and colleagues.2

The self-reported dietary intake and energy expenditure results by diet group are presented in Table 2 in the article. Participants reported a baseline energy intake of about 1800 kcal/d to 2000 kcal/d, and with weight-loss treatments, intake levels were reduced by approximately 300 kcal/d to between 1500 kcal/d and 1700 kcal/d. Small increases in self-reported total energy expenditure were also observed over time in all 4 study groups.

The values presented in Table 2 suggest major patient misreporting that raises questions about their validity. Participants would have been expected . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Steven B. Heymsfield, MD
steven_heymsfield@merck.com
Merck & Co
Rahway, New Jersey

George L. Blackburn, MD, PhD
Harvard Medical School
Boston, Massachusetts



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Comparison of Weight-Loss Diets
and
JAMA. ;298():173-173.
FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Weight-Loss Diets

JAMA. ;298():174-174.
FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Weight-Loss Diets--Reply
, , and
JAMA. ;298():174-175.
FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLES

Comparison of the Atkins, Ornish, Weight Watchers, and Zone Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trial
, , , , and
JAMA. ;293():43-53.
FULL TEXT  

Comparison of the Atkins, Zone, Ornish, and LEARN Diets for Change in Weight and Related Risk Factors Among Overweight Premenopausal Women: The A TO Z Weight Loss Study: A Randomized Trial
, , , , , , , and
JAMA. ;297():969-977.
FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.