This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related letters  • Related article  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Neurology  • Cerebrovascular Disease  • Stroke  • Cardiovascular System  • Statistics and Research Methods  • Women's Health  • Women's Health, Other  • Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Dr Ridker and colleagues¹ report good results for their cardiovascular risk-scoring method for women, the Reynolds Risk Score. However, the comparison they make to a risk score published by the Framingham Study group is unfairly weighted against the Framingham score. The "validation data" on which the 2 scores are evaluated are closely related to the data on which the Reynolds score is built, having been recruited simultaneously from the same population with the same inclusion criteria and recruitment procedures, and separated from the "training data" only by random resampling. This data set therefore has a close relation to the Reynolds score that it does not have with the Framingham score. The Reynolds score is being subjected to a "cross-validation" procedure while the Framingham score is subjected to "external validation", regarded as a much sterner test.²

In addition, the Framingham risk score used here is for coronary heart . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Richard Stevens, BA, MSc, PhD
richard.stevens@ceu.ox.ac.uk
Cancer Epidemiology Unit

Ruth Coleman, BSc, MSc
Diabetes Trials Unit
University of Oxford
Oxford, England

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Algorithms for Assessing Cardiovascular Risk in Women
, , and
JAMA. ;298():175-176.
FULL TEXT  

Algorithms for Assessing Cardiovascular Risk in Women
, , and
JAMA. ;298():176-176.
FULL TEXT  

Algorithms for Assessing Cardiovascular Risk in Women
, , and
JAMA. ;298():177-177.
FULL TEXT  

Algorithms for Assessing Cardiovascular Risk in Women--Reply
and
JAMA. ;298():177-178.
FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

Development and Validation of Improved Algorithms for the Assessment of Global Cardiovascular Risk in Women: The Reynolds Risk Score
, , , and
JAMA. ;297():611-619.
FULL TEXT