You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 298 No. 23, December 19, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (10)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Medical Practice, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Nonpayment for Harms Resulting From Medical Care

Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections

Heidi L. Wald, MD, MSPH; Andrew M. Kramer, MD

JAMA. 2007;298(23):2782-2784.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

First, do no harm" is one of the enduring principles of the health care professions. In a painful irony, however, the current reimbursement system not only fails to penalize hospitals for largely preventable harms due to medical care, but it often rewards them in the form of additional reimbursement.1 That paradigm will change, however, in response to a modification to the Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS), which the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) instituted on August 1, 2007. Following a congressional mandate,2 the CMS has reshaped the reimbursement system to hold hospitals accountable for failing to avert 8 largely preventable harms (Box) resulting from medical care.3


Box. Hospital-Acquired Conditions Selected for Fiscal Year 2008 Final Rule (in Rank Order)

Serious preventable event—object left in place during surgery
Serious preventable event—air embolism
Serious preventable event—blood incompatibility
Catheter-associated urinary . . . [Full Text of this Article]


The Rule Change Explained

Author Affiliations: Division of Health Care Policy and Research, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, Aurora.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Reducing Use of Indwelling Urinary Catheters and Associated Urinary Tract Infections
Elpern et al.
Am J Crit Care 2009;18:535-541.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of a Comanaged Geriatric Fracture Center on Short-term Hip Fracture Outcomes
Friedman et al.
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1712-1717.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection and the Medicare Rule Changes
Saint et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2009;150:877-884.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Wisdom and Justice of Not Paying for "Preventable Complications"
Pronovost et al.
JAMA 2008;299:2197-2199.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.