 |
|
Changing the Organization of Health Care
|
|
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
|
|
To the Editor: In their Special Communication, Drs Porter and Teisberg1 make a number of reasonable suggestions for how to improve the quality of health care. However, I consider their fundamental assumption (better quality of care reduces health care costs) questionable. Many health care interventions increase health care costs.2 This means that improving the quality of care by reducing an underuse of health care interventions will in general increase rather than decrease costs. Given that US adults receive only 55% of recommended care3 and that each unit reduction of a quality deficit results in an overproportional increase of costs,4 vast resources may be needed to achieve high quality of care.
Even if the target of quality improvement activities is the reduction of overuse and misuse, it is not clear that cost savings will result. Quality improvement activities themselves incur costs, and reducing errors or complications might increase costs in the . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Afschin Gandjour, MD, PhD
afschin.gandjour@uk-koeln.de
Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology
University of Cologne
Cologne, Germany
RELATED LETTERS
Changing the Organization of Health Care
Truls Østbye and Lloyd Michener
JAMA. 2007;298(3):286-287.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Changing the Organization of Health Care—Reply
Michael E. Porter and Elizabeth Olmsted Teisberg
JAMA. 2007;298(3):287-288.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED ARTICLE
How Physicians Can Change the Future of Health Care
Michael E. Porter and Elizabeth Olmsted Teisberg
JAMA. 2007;297(10):1103-1111.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|
