You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 298 No. 6, August 8, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (13)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Conflict of Interest
 •Health Policy
 •Law and Medicine
 •Medical Education
 •Medical Practice, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Alliance Between Society and Medicine

The Public's Stake in Medical Professionalism

Jordan J. Cohen, MD; Sylvia Cruess, MD; Christopher Davidson, MB

JAMA. 2007;298:670-673.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In 2002, the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation, the American College of Physicians Foundation, and the European Federation of Internal Medicine published A Physician Charter: Medical Professionalism in the New Millennium, which articulated a set of professional responsibilities that physicians were considered honor-bound to fulfill.1-2 On close reading of the charter, it is clear that the institutional and organizational settings of contemporary medical practice pose significant impediments to achieving several of the responsibilities to be assumed by physicians. Moreover, many of those impediments are so deeply imbedded in all health care systems that they are beyond the control of physicians. Only those in a position to effect system-wide changes (eg, elected officials, ministers of heath) can eliminate these structural impediments. Consequently, if the public is to continue to enjoy the unique benefits that medical professionalism can offer, some . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: Association of American Medical Colleges, Departments of Medicine and Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC (Dr Cohen); Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (Dr Cruess); and Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, England (Dr Davidson).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A Perspective on Commercial Relationships Between Ophthalmology and Industry
Jampol et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127:1194-1202.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Medical professionalism in a commercialized health care market
RELMAN
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine 2008;75:S33-S36.
FULL TEXT  

Invited Article: Professionalism in neurology: The role of law
Larriviere and Beresford
Neurology 2008;71:1283-1288.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Medical Professionalism in a Commercialized Health Care Market
Relman
JAMA 2007;298:2668-2670.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.