This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (13)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Medical Practice  • Medical Education  • Quality of Care  • Quality of Care, Other  • Prognosis/ Outcomes  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

The Devil Is in the Details

Paul Batalden, MD; Frank Davidoff, MD

JAMA. 2007;298(9):1059-1061.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

From the list of 14 characteristics he assembled in 1980, Cyril Houle, a serious student of professional education, singled out self-development as professionalism's one unchanging feature; as he put it, "[A]s an occupational group raises its level of performance . . . its right to call itself a profession increases."¹ Houle's choice of words warrants serious attention: a profession is defined by what it does, not just what it knows, and by doing what it does better all the time, not just doing it well.

Medicine's enormous and highly specialized body of knowledge inarguably makes it a learned profession, but delivering care is performance, not scholarship. In its most basic form, the delivery of science-based care consists of applying generalizable scientific knowledge to the problems of particular patients who are ill, with the result that those patients are better off. Learning to deliver care therefore means going beyond . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: Center for Evaluative Clinical Sciences, Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, New Hampshire (Dr Batalden); and Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Dr Davidoff).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Effectiveness of Teaching Quality Improvement to Clinicians: A Systematic Review
Romsai T. Boonyasai, Donna M. Windish, Chayan Chakraborti, Leonard S. Feldman, Haya R. Rubin, and Eric B. Bass
JAMA. 2007;298(9):1023-1037.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Doctors and quality improvement
Hockey and Marshall
JRSM 2009;102:173-176.
FULL TEXT  

A hospital-randomized controlled trial of a formal quality improvement educational program in rural and small community Texas hospitals: one year results
Filardo et al.
Int J Qual Health Care 2009;0:mzp019v1-mzp019.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cancer: The Road to Amiens
Stewart and Kurzrock
JCO 2009;27:328-333.
FULL TEXT  

Publication guidelines for quality improvement studies in health care: evolution of the SQUIRE project
Davidoff et al.
BMJ 2009;338:a3152-a3152.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Publication Guidelines for Improvement Studies in Health Care: Evolution of the SQUIRE Project
Davidoff et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2008;149:670-676.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Publication guidelines for quality improvement in health care: evolution of the SQUIRE project
Davidoff et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2008;17:i3-i9.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The UK needs an Institute of Medicine
Minhas et al.
BMJ 2008;337:a1623-a1623.
FULL TEXT  

Doctors, managers and the battle for quality
Marshall
JRSM 2008;101:330-331.
FULL TEXT  

Accelerating Best Care in Pennsylvania: Adapting a Large Academic System's Quality Improvement Process to Rural Community Hospitals
Haydar et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2008;23:252-258.
ABSTRACT  

Assessing Competencies of Knowledge and Process Improvement
Dewar
JAMA 2008;299:2276-2276.
FULL TEXT  

A proposal: publication guidelines for healthcare improvement education reports
Stevens and Andersson-Gare
Qual Saf Health Care 2007;16:402-402.
FULL TEXT