You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 299 No. 1, January 2, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Women's Health
 •Women's Health, Other
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Utility of Different Lipid Measures to Predict Coronary Heart Disease

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Dr Ingelsson and colleagues1 conclude that their data do not support measurement of apo B or apo A-I in clinical practice when total cholesterol and HDL-C measurements are available. We believe their conclusions reach further than their data support.

First, the authors focus on the statistical significance of population-level models but apply their conclusions to the individual patient level. Second, the analysis was limited to low-risk, middle-aged white patients. By limiting their population to "healthy patients," the authors specifically excluded patients with elevated triglyceride concentration—a population known to have higher apo B levels in the setting of normal traditional lipids.2 This omission could have skewed their data toward their conclusion. Third, the predictive value of the apo B:apo A-I ratio improves as a patient's risk (as measured by traditional risk markers) increases,3 and levels of HDL-C or apo A-I may not always represent the true protective or . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Joshua Remick, MD
remicj01@med.nyu.edu

James A. Underberg, MS, MD; Nirav R. Shah, MD, MPH
Division of General Internal Medicine
New York University School of Medicine
New York



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Utility of Different Lipid Measures to Predict Coronary Heart Disease
Justo Sierra-Johnson, Abel Romero-Corral, and Francisco Lopez-Jimenez
JAMA. 2008;299(1):35.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Utility of Different Lipid Measures to Predict Coronary Heart Disease—Reply
Erik Ingelsson, Michael J. Pencina, Ralph B. D’Agostino, and Ramachandran S. Vasan
JAMA. 2008;299(1):36.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

Clinical Utility of Different Lipid Measures for Prediction of Coronary Heart Disease in Men and Women
Erik Ingelsson, Ernst J. Schaefer, John H. Contois, Judith R. McNamara, Lisa Sullivan, Michelle J. Keyes, Michael J. Pencina, Christopher Schoonmaker, Peter W. F. Wilson, Ralph B. D’Agostino, and Ramachandran S. Vasan
JAMA. 2007;298(7):776-785.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.