You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 299 No. 13, April 2, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Neurology
 •Cognitive Disorders
 •Critical Care/ Intensive Care Medicine
 •Adult Critical Care
 •Psychiatry
 •Delirium
 •Drug Therapy
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Sedation With Dexmedetomidine vs Lorazepam in Mechanically Ventilated Patients

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To The Editor: In the MENDS trial, Dr Pandharipande and colleagues1 concluded that dexmedetomidine infusion resulted in more days alive without delirium or coma and more time at the targeted level of sedation than with a lorazepam infusion. It remains unclear whether the study findings are due to the benefits of dexmedetomidine or are a result of the study design itself.

The trial was designed so that an increase of 1 mL per hour of the unknown drug resulted in an increase of either 0.15 µg per hour in dexmedetomidine or 1.0 mg per hour in lorazepam. These are not equivalent doses of medications, as demonstrated by the reported median infusion rate for dexmedetomidine of 5 mL per hour and, for lorazepam, only 3 mL per hour. Moreover, dexmedetomidine has a much shorter half-life (2-3 hours) compared with lorazepam (10 hours).2-3

This nonequivalence of drug raises a number of questions. . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Hannah Wunsch, MD, MSc
hw2125@columbia.edu

Joseph S. Meltzer, MD
Department of Anesthesiology
Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons
New York, New York



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Effect of Sedation With Dexmedetomidine vs Lorazepam on Acute Brain Dysfunction in Mechanically Ventilated Patients: The MENDS Randomized Controlled Trial
Pratik P. Pandharipande, Brenda T. Pun, Daniel L. Herr, Mervyn Maze, Timothy D. Girard, Russell R. Miller, Ayumi K. Shintani, Jennifer L. Thompson, James C. Jackson, Stephen A. Deppen, Renee A. Stiles, Robert S. Dittus, Gordon R. Bernard, and E. Wesley Ely
JAMA. 2007;298(22):2644-2653.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTERS

Sedation With Dexmedetomidine vs Lorazepam in Mechanically Ventilated Patients
Bryan Dotson and Michael J. Peeters
JAMA. 2008;299(13):1540.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sedation With Dexmedetomidine vs Lorazepam in Mechanically Ventilated Patients
Jeffrey F. Barletta and John W. Devlin
JAMA. 2008;299(13):1541-1542.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sedation With Dexmedetomidine vs Lorazepam in Mechanically Ventilated Patients—Reply
Pratik P. Pandharipande, Timothy D. Girard, and E. Wesley Ely
JAMA. 2008;299(13):1542.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.