You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 299 No. 13, April 2, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Psychiatry
 •Depression
 •Obesity
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Quality of Life
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Drug Therapy
 •Adverse Effects
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Hope and Fear of Rimonabant

John S. Rumsfeld, MD, PhD; Brahmajee K. Nallamothu, MD, MPH

JAMA. 2008;299(13):1601-1602. Published online April 1, 2008 (doi:10.1001/jama.299.13.1601).

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

From a patient's perspective, the principal questions about medical therapeutics are "Will I live longer or feel better?" and "What are the risks?" Until answers about the benefits of treatment on meaningful patient outcomes as well as about the attendant treatment risks are available, therapies have no role in the clinical armamentarium. Yet the answers to these deceptively simple questions often remain uncertain, even for some therapies commonly used in medical practice. The 2 faces of uncertainty for new therapeutics are hope and fear. The hope is that a treatment will provide meaningful benefits on patient outcomes. The fear is that, pending robust outcome studies, the only documented "benefits" of treatment may be for surrogate measures that may not translate into better outcomes or that any benefit will come at the expense of unacceptable risks.

Against this background is the . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: Section of Cardiology, Denver Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver, Colorado; Department of Medicine, University of Colorado at Denver, Aurora (Dr Rumsfeld); Section of Cardiology, Ann Arbor Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (Dr Nallamothu).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Effect of Rimonabant on Progression of Atherosclerosis in Patients With Abdominal Obesity and Coronary Artery Disease: The STRADIVARIUS Randomized Controlled Trial
Steven E. Nissen, Stephen J. Nicholls, Kathy Wolski, Josep Rodés-Cabau, Christopher P. Cannon, John E. Deanfield, Jean-Pierre Després, John J. P. Kastelein, Steven R. Steinhubl, Samir Kapadia, Muhammad Yasin, Witold Ruzyllo, Christophe Gaudin, Bernard Job, Bo Hu, Deepak L. Bhatt, A. Michael Lincoff, E. Murat Tuzcu, and for the STRADIVARIUS Investigators
JAMA. 2008;299(13):1547-1560.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Rimonabant and Progression of Atherosclerosis in Obese Persons
Dora and Scheffel
JAMA 2008;300:280-280.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.