You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 299 No. 14, April 9, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Capitol Health Call
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Caring for the Uninsured and Underinsured
 •Law and Medicine
 •Medical Practice, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Demonstration Projects

Mike Mitka

JAMA. 2008;299(14):1657.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 127 words of the full text and any section headings.

The US Department of Health and Human Services did not adequately ensure that Medicaid demonstration projects in Florida and Vermont, intended to explore new ways to deliver and pay for health care (such as through managed care), were budget neutral as required by federal law, according to the Government Accountability Office (GAO). As a result, the GAO estimated that Medicaid spent an excess $6.9 billion in Florida and $246 million more in Vermont for the 5-year demonstration projects.

The excess costs angered some congressional Democrats. Frank J. Pallone (D, NJ), chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee's Health Subcommittee, said in a release, "Once again, beneficiaries are being moved into managed care plans that offer fewer benefits but produce zero savings for the federal government."







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.