You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 299 No. 14, April 9, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letter
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Venous Thromboembolism
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Pulmonary Diseases, Other
 •Radiologic Imaging
 •Women's Health
 •Pregnancy and Breast Feeding
 •Angiology
 •Computed Tomography
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Evaluation of Suspected Pulmonary Embolism During Pregnancy

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 89 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: In his Editorial, Dr Glassroth1 suggests that during pregnancy ventilation-perfusion lung scanning is preferred to computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) because radiation dosage is higher with CTPA. However, with respect to the fetus the opposite is true: CTPA exposes the fetus to less radiation.2-3 The more important CTPA-related radiation risk during pregnancy is to the breasts,4 a risk that may be offset by the use of breast shields.5 In general, when pulmonary embolism is suspected during pregnancy, CTPA is the preferred study.

Financial Disclosures: None reported.

Mark D. Siegel, MD
mark.siegel@yale.edu
Yale University School of Medicine
New Haven, Connecticut

1. Glassroth J. Imaging of pulmonary embolism: too much of a good thing? JAMA. 2007;298(23):2788-2789. FREE FULL TEXT
2. Groves AM, Yates SJ, Win T; et al. CT pulmonary angiography versus ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy in pregnancy: implications from a UK survey of doctors' knowledge of radiation exposure. Radiology. 2006;240(3):765-770. FREE FULL TEXT
3. Winer-Muram HT, Boone JM, Brown HL, Jennings SG, Mabie WC, Lombardo GT. Pulmonary embolism in pregnant patients: fetal radiation dose with helical CT. Radiology. 2002;224(2):487-492. FREE FULL TEXT
4. Hurwitz LM, Reiman RE, Yoshizumi TT; et al. Radiation dose from contemporary cardiothoracic multidetector CT protocols with an anthropomorphic female phantom: implications for cancer induction. Radiology. 2007;245(3):742-750. FREE FULL TEXT
5. Hopper KD, King SH, Lobell ME, TenHave TR, Weaver JS. The breast: in-plane x-ray protection during diagnostic thoracic CT: shielding with bismuth radioprotective garments. Radiology. 1997;205(3):853-858. FREE FULL TEXT

Letters Section Editor: Robert M. Golub, MD, Senior Editor.

JAMA. 2008;299(14):1665.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Imaging of Pulmonary Embolism: Too Much of a Good Thing?
Jeffrey Glassroth
JAMA. 2007;298(23):2788-2789.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTER

Evaluation of Suspected Pulmonary Embolism During Pregnancy—Reply
Jeffrey Glassroth
JAMA. 2008;299(14):1665-1666.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.