 |
 |

Prevalent Vertebral Fracture and the Risk of Incident Vertebral Fracture—Reply
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
In Reply: Dr Taguchi raises the hypothesis that in our study symptomatic women with a prevalent vertebral fracture at baseline might be more likely to have received treatment and thus have had a lower risk of developing incident fractures. However, when we adjusted all models for baseline use of estrogen and any use of estrogen, bisphosphonate, or selective estrogen receptor modulator over the follow-up period, the results were essentially the same. Although the prevalence of back pain due to vertebral fractures is unknown1 and we do not have information on clinical spine fractures, we performed an additional analysis stratifying women with a prevalent vertebral fracture by whether or not they self-reported back pain at baseline. In our study of 2680 women, vertebral fracture incidence rates were 14.2% for women without a prevalent vertebral fracture (n = 2286), 36.5% for women with a prevalent vertebral fracture and no back pain (n = 104), and 43.1% . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Jane A. Cauley, DrPH
jcauley@edc.pitt.edu Department of Epidemiology University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Li-Yung Lui, MA, MS
San Francisco Coordinating Center California Pacific Medical Center San Francisco
Teresa A. Hillier, MD, MS
Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research Northwest/Hawaii Portland, Oregon
RELATED LETTERS
Prevalent Vertebral Fracture and the Risk of Incident Vertebral Fracture
Akira Taguchi
JAMA. 2008;299(14):1666.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Prevalent Vertebral Fracture and the Risk of Incident Vertebral Fracture
Elizabeth J. Samelson and Douglas P. Kiel
JAMA. 2008;299(14):1666.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|