You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 299 No. 15, April 16, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •World Health
 •Human Rights
 •Nursing Care
 •Alert me on articles by topic

The International Migration and Recruitment of Nurses

Human Rights and Global Justice

Lawrence O. Gostin, JD

JAMA. 2008;299(15):1827-1829.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The international migration of health care workers—physicians, nurses, midwives, and pharmacists—leaves the world's poorest countries with severe human resource shortages, seriously jeopardizing the achievement of the UN Health Millennium Development Goals.1 Advocates for global health call active recruitment in low-income countries a crime.2-3 Despite the pronounced international concern, there is little research and few solutions.4 This Commentary focuses on the international recruitment of internationally educated nurses (IENs) from the perspective of human rights and global justice.

Misdistribution of Health Care Workers

Although the World Health Assembly calls the human resource shortage "a crisis in health,"5 leading to the creation of the Global Health Workforce Alliance, no international or national agency is charged with quantifying or solving the problem. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that 4.3 million more health care workers are required to meet the Health Millennium Development Goals, identifying 57 countries with critical shortages. Thirty-six of these countries are . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliation: O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC.







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.