You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 299 No. 15, April 16, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on ISI (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Humanities
 •Medicine and the Media
 •Journalology/ Peer Review/ Authorship
 •Medical Ethics
 •Adverse Effects
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Impugning the Integrity of Medical Science

The Adverse Effects of Industry Influence

Catherine D. DeAngelis, MD, MPH; Phil B. Fontanarosa, MD, MBA

JAMA. 2008;299(15):1833-1835.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The profession of medicine, in every aspect—clinical, education, and research—has been inundated with profound influence from the pharmaceutical and medical device industries. This has occurred because physicians have allowed it to happen, and it is time to stop.

Two articles1-2 in this issue of JAMA provide a glimpse of one company's apparent misrepresentation of research data and its manipulation of clinical research articles and clinical reviews; such information and articles influence the education and clinical practice of physicians and other health professionals. The direct influence of for-profit companies on education3-6 and clinical practice7-8 has been well documented, so this Editorial deals primarily with clinical research.

The articles by Ross and colleagues1 and by Psaty and Kronmal2 document how one company, Merck & Co Inc, apparently manipulated dozens of publications to promote one of its products. But make no mistake—the manipulation . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: Dr DeAngelis is Editor in Chief (cathy.deangelis@jama-archives.org) and Dr Fontanarosa is Executive Deputy Editor, JAMA.


RELATED ARTICLES

Guest Authorship and Ghostwriting in Publications Related to Rofecoxib: A Case Study of Industry Documents From Rofecoxib Litigation
Joseph S. Ross, Kevin P. Hill, David S. Egilman, and Harlan M. Krumholz
JAMA. 2008;299(15):1800-1812.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reporting Mortality Findings in Trials of Rofecoxib for Alzheimer Disease or Cognitive Impairment: A Case Study Based on Documents From Rofecoxib Litigation
Bruce M. Psaty and Richard A. Kronmal
JAMA. 2008;299(15):1813-1817.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.