You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 299 No. 16, April 23/30, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Aging/ Geriatrics
 •Medical Practice
 •Health Policy
 •Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care
 •Treatment Adherence
 •Drug Therapy
 •Adherence
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Medicare Part D

A Successful Start With Room for Improvement

Dana P. Goldman, PhD; Geoffrey F. Joyce, PhD

JAMA. 2008;299(16):1954-1955.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Medicare Part D represents a bold experiment to publicly fund, but privately sell and administer, prescription drug insurance. Part D is only a relatively small part of the overall Medicare program; Medicare spent $432 billion overall in 2007, of which Part D accounted for only 11.6% ($50 billion).1 However, the Medicare program is so large that Part D alone should account for 1% of the entire economy in less than 2 decades.1 Furthermore, there is little room for more spending, given the trustees' recent forecast of $12 trillion in unfunded liabilities over the next 75 years—a debt just slightly smaller than the entire US economy.1 So much appears to be riding on Part D's success or failure, including possible models for the provision of health insurance to the currently uninsured. Two articles2-3 in this issue of JAMA raise important concerns about the . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California (Drs Goldman and Joyce), and National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Dr Goldman).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Cost-Related Medication Nonadherence and Spending on Basic Needs Following Implementation of Medicare Part D
Jeanne M. Madden, Amy J. Graves, Fang Zhang, Alyce S. Adams, Becky A. Briesacher, Dennis Ross-Degnan, Jerry H. Gurwitz, Marsha Pierre-Jacques, Dana Gelb Safran, Gerald S. Adler, and Stephen B. Soumerai
JAMA. 2008;299(16):1922-1928.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Medicare Beneficiaries' Knowledge of Part D Prescription Drug Program Benefits and Responses to Drug Costs
John Hsu, Vicki Fung, Mary Price, Jie Huang, Richard Brand, Rita Hui, Bruce Fireman, and Joseph P. Newhouse
JAMA. 2008;299(16):1929-1936.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Medicare Part D Enrollment in a Biracial Community-Based Population of Older Adults
Skarupski et al.
The Gerontologist 2009;0:gnp055v1-gnp055.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.