This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Sexually Transmitted Diseases  • Patient Education/ Health Literacy  • Pediatrics  • Adolescent Medicine  • Infectious Diseases  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Tracy Hampton, PhD

JAMA. 2008;299(17):2013-2015.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Chicago—Over the past decade, the US federal government has heavily promoted programs that advocate sexual abstinence as the key strategy for dealing with adolescent sexuality, but studies are demonstrating that the approach has little impact on teen sexual behavior or in preventing pregnancy or sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). As a result, health professionals and government officials are working to end the programs and to expand funding for other types of sexual education initiatives, and many states have refused federal funding for abstinence-only programs.

"By 2005, there were more than 800 programs that had been funded with over $1.5 billion, and increasingly, professionals, parents, policy makers, and adolescents have been raising concerns," said John Santelli, MD, MPH, of the Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health in New York City. The mounting pressure to revamp sex education programs was a topic of discussion at the 2008 National . . . [Full Text of this Article]

ABSTINENCE-ONLY PROGRAMS



CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Premarital Sexual Intercourse Among Adolescents in an Asian Country: Multilevel Ecological Factors
Wong et al.
Pediatrics 2009;124:e44-e52.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT