You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 299 No. 17, May 7, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letter
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Drug Therapy
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Study Power in the SORT OUT II Trial

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 149 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: In their randomized trial, Dr Galløe and colleagues1 compared the efficacy and safety of sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in a study design reflecting common clinical practice. In the trial design,2 the authors defined the primary outcome measures as "MACE (cardiac death, MI, TVR, TLR, TVF) during 9 months." However, in the article's power calculation, the authors used estimated 5-year event rates for sample size calculation: "The SORT OUT II trial was therefore planned to enroll at least 1800 patients to detect a minimum relevant relative difference in rates of 25% (ie, rates of 20% vs 15%) with 5 years of follow-up."

Shorter follow-up length for primary outcome measure, compared with that used for sample size calculation, would be expected to reduce event rate and study power and could have led to the study finding of no statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes.

Financial Disclosures: None reported.

Hideaki Kaneda, MD, PhD
hdkaneda@gmail.com
Okinaka Memorial Institute for Medical Research
Tokyo, Japan

1. Galløe AM, Thuesen L, Kelbaek H; et al. Comparison of paclitaxel- and sirolimus-eluting stents in everyday clinical practice: the SORT OUT II randomized trial. JAMA. 2008;299(4):409-416. FREE FULL TEXT
2. Comparison of cypher select and taxus express coronary stents. http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00388934?term=00388934&rank=1. Accessed March 12, 2008.

Letters Section Editor: Robert M. Golub, MD, Senior Editor.

JAMA. 2008;299(17):2021-2022.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Comparison of Paclitaxel- and Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Everyday Clinical Practice: The SORT OUT II Randomized Trial
Anders M. Galløe, Leif Thuesen, Henning Kelbæk, Per Thayssen, Klaus Rasmussen, Peter R. Hansen, Niels Bligaard, Kari Saunamäki, Anders Junker, Jens Aarøe, Ulrik Abildgaard, Jan Ravkilde, Thomas Engstrøm, Jan S. Jensen, Henning R. Andersen, Hans E. Bøtker, Søren Galatius, Steen D. Kristensen, Jan K. Madsen, Lars R. Krusell, Steen Z. Abildstrøm, Ghita B. Stephansen, Jens F. Lassen, and for the SORT OUT II Investigators
JAMA. 2008;299(4):409-416.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTER

Study Power in the SORT OUT II Trial—Reply
Anders Michael Galløe, Niels Bligaard, and Peter Riis Hansen
JAMA. 2008;299(17):2022.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.