This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (12)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Health Policy  • Quality of Care  • Patient Safety/ Medical Error  • Quality of Care, Other  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Peter J. Pronovost, MD, PhD; Christine A. Goeschel, RN, MPA, MPS; Robert M. Wachter, MD

JAMA. 2008;299(18):2197-2199.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Far too many patients experience preventable harm from medical care in US hospitals. To promote quality and safety, many employers and insurers are linking financial incentives to clinical performance. These programs, often called pay for performance, use a carrot (pay more for better quality) or a stick (pay less for lower quality). To date, most pay-for-performance programs have encouraged physicians to use evidence-based interventions or improve patient satisfaction.¹

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has taken the lead, with many insurers following, in linking pay for performance to reducing harm.² In October 2008, hospitals will no longer derive additional payments they sometimes receive when Medicare patients develop 1 of the following 8 preventable complications: objects (such as surgical instruments or sponges) left in patients after surgery, hospital-acquired urinary tract infections, central line–associated bloodstream . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Complications Should Be Important and Measurable

Author Affiliations: Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine (Dr Pronovost and Ms Goeschel), Surgery and Health Policy & Management (Dr Pronovost), and School of Nursing (Ms Goeschel), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; and Division of Hospital Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (Dr Wachter).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Balancing "No Blame" with Accountability in Patient Safety
Wachter and Pronovost
NEJM 2009;361:1401-1406.
FULL TEXT  

Medicare's New Hospital Payment Rule: Limitations and Unintended Consequences
Bahl and Campbell
American Journal of Medical Quality 2009;24:347-351.
 

Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection and the Medicare Rule Changes
Saint et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2009;150:877-884.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Measuring Preventable Harm: Helping Science Keep Pace With Policy
Pronovost and Colantuoni
JAMA 2009;301:1273-1275.
FULL TEXT  

Dexmedetomidine vs Midazolam for Sedation of Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Trial
Riker et al.
JAMA 2009;301:489-499.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Physician Autonomy and Informed Decision Making: Finding the Balance for Patient Safety and Quality
Mathews and Pronovost
JAMA 2008;300:2913-2915.
FULL TEXT  

Nosocomial Infection, the Deficit Reduction Act, and Incentives for Hospitals
Graves and McGowan
JAMA 2008;300:1577-1579.
FULL TEXT