 |
 |

Genetic Testing and Primary Care—Reply
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
In Reply: Dr Lipinski and colleagues question whether primary care is ready for the genetics revolution and raise important issues about informed consent, primary care physician discomfort in providing genetic counseling, and utility of genetic testing. We agree that there are multiple challenges in translating genetic testing to practice; that was the reason for our Commentary. Genetic testing is already occurring in practice before fully confronting these challenges. We advocate an evidence-based and planned approach involving education of clinicians and a nationally recognized organization that makes decisions on the suitability of tests for practice. We recognize that many genetic tests are not ready for general use and emphasize the need to simultaneously address behavioral, environmental, and public health approaches to impact health outcomes.
Dr Klein notes that clinical laboratories are already subject to both governmental regulation and voluntary professional guidelines and states that enhanced regulation should be approached with caution. . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Tina L. Cheng, MD, MPH
tcheng2@jhmi.edu Department of Pediatrics
Ronald D. Cohn, MD
McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine
George J. Dover, MD
Department of Pediatrics Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, Maryland
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
The Genetics Revolution and Primary Care Pediatrics
Tina L. Cheng, Ronald D. Cohn, and George J. Dover
JAMA. 2008;299(4):451-453.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED LETTERS
Genetic Testing and Primary Care
Shawn E. Lipinski, Michael J. Lipinski, and William G. Wilson
JAMA. 2008;299(19):2274-2275.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Genetic Testing and Primary Care
Roger D. Klein
JAMA. 2008;299(19):2275.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|