You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 299 No. 19, May 21, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Law and Medicine
 •Primary Care/ Family Medicine
 •Quality of Care
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Genetics
 •Genetic Counseling/ Testing/ Therapy
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Genetic Testing and Primary Care—Reply

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In Reply: Dr Lipinski and colleagues question whether primary care is ready for the genetics revolution and raise important issues about informed consent, primary care physician discomfort in providing genetic counseling, and utility of genetic testing. We agree that there are multiple challenges in translating genetic testing to practice; that was the reason for our Commentary. Genetic testing is already occurring in practice before fully confronting these challenges. We advocate an evidence-based and planned approach involving education of clinicians and a nationally recognized organization that makes decisions on the suitability of tests for practice. We recognize that many genetic tests are not ready for general use and emphasize the need to simultaneously address behavioral, environmental, and public health approaches to impact health outcomes.

Dr Klein notes that clinical laboratories are already subject to both governmental regulation and voluntary professional guidelines and states that enhanced regulation should be approached with caution. . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Tina L. Cheng, MD, MPH
tcheng2@jhmi.edu
Department of Pediatrics

Ronald D. Cohn, MD
McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine

George J. Dover, MD
Department of Pediatrics
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

The Genetics Revolution and Primary Care Pediatrics
Tina L. Cheng, Ronald D. Cohn, and George J. Dover
JAMA. 2008;299(4):451-453.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTERS

Genetic Testing and Primary Care
Shawn E. Lipinski, Michael J. Lipinski, and William G. Wilson
JAMA. 2008;299(19):2274-2275.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Genetic Testing and Primary Care
Roger D. Klein
JAMA. 2008;299(19):2275.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.