You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 299 No. 2, January 9/16, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Capitol Health Call
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Law and Medicine
 •Tobacco
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Cigarette Ratings Questioned

Mike Mitka

JAMA. 2008;299(2):163.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

A Senate Commerce Committee hearing explored the accuracy of the Federal Trade Commission's (FTC’s) tar and nicotine cigarette rating system and the marketing claims of cigarette companies based on these ratings.

At the November 13 hearing, Sen Frank R. Lautenberg (D, NJ), who chaired the session, said he had uncovered a lengthy history of false and deceptive cigarette ratings and marketing practices. "It is now clear that the tobacco industry has been aware of the inaccuracy of these ratings for more than 3 decades," said Lautenberg.


Figure 70011FA
US Senators question the "low-tar" and "light" marketing claims by cigarette makers. (Photo credit: iStockphoto.com)

At issue is the method used by the FTC to determine tar and nicotine levels in each brand. Cigarettes that deliver comparatively lower levels of tar and nicotine are then marketed as "light" and "low-tar" by the tobacco industry. But smokers of these products often inhale . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.