This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Related letters  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Oncology  • Lung Cancer  • Pulmonary Diseases  • Surgery  • Surgical Interventions  • Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery  • Diagnosis  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: In their study of minimally invasive endoscopic staging of suspected lung cancer, Dr Wallace and colleagues¹ concluded that endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EBUS-FNA) has higher sensitivity than traditional transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA). When evaluating the relative accuracy of a newer technique, it is important to ensure that the standard technique (in this case TBNA) is performed to recognized standards.

The authors acknowledge that rapid on-site cytological evaluation (ROSE) may increase the yield of TBNA² but not of the ultrasound-guided techniques.³ The exclusion of ROSE from the study protocol may therefore have resulted in a suboptimized sensitivity of TBNA. Furthermore, the number of passes into the lymph node with traditional TBNA may also affect yield. The authors performed "at least 3" passes, while optimal yield may require 7 aspirates.² These 2 factors combined may have biased the study toward the ultrasound-guided techniques.

In addition, it is important to . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Neal Navani, MA, MRCP
Centre for Respiratory Research

Sam M. Janes, MSc, MRCP, PhD
Centre for Respiratory Research
University College London
London, United Kingdom

Stephen G. Spiro, MD, FRCP
stephen.spiro@uclh.nhs.uk
Department of Thoracic Medicine
University College Hospital
London, United Kingdom

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Staging of Suspected Lung Cancer
Michael B. Wallace, Jorge M. S. Pascual, Massimo Raimondo, Timothy A. Woodward, Barbara L. McComb, Julia E. Crook, Margaret M. Johnson, Mohammad A. Al-Haddad, Seth A. Gross, Surakit Pungpapong, Joy N. Hardee, and John A. Odell
JAMA. 2008;299(5):540-546.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTERS

Lung Cancer Staging With Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Techniques
Domenico Galetta, Maria Serra, and Lorenzo Spaggiari
JAMA. 2008;299(21):2509-2510.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Lung Cancer Staging With Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Techniques
Jouke T. Annema, Kurt G. Tournoy, and Klaus F. Rabe
JAMA. 2008;299(21):2510.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Lung Cancer Staging With Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Techniques—Reply
Michael B. Wallace
JAMA. 2008;299(21):2510-2511.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT