You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 299 No. 23, June 18, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letter
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology
 •Colon Cancer
 •Surgery
 •Surgical Interventions
 •Colorectal Surgery
 •Diagnosis
 •Gastroenterology
 •Gastrointestinal Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Screening for Nonpolypoid Colorectal Neoplasms

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: In their cross-sectional study, Dr Soetikno and colleagues1 reported that nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasms were relatively common in an older male veterans hospital population. We have several concerns regarding the study design and conclusions.

The terminology is unclear. A distinction must be made between the relatively flat lesions described in this study (defined as elevated lesions with a height less than half the diameter) and completely flat or depressed lesions. The authors note that "completely flat lesions are exceedingly rare" and were presumably absent in this study. Depressed lesions comprised less than 1% of all colorectal lesions (18/2770), only 4 of which were seen at screening. Therefore, nearly all nonpolypoid lesions were elevated from the surrounding mucosa, which is a critical distinction favoring detection at both standard colonoscopy and computed tomographic (CT) colonography.

Given the lack of metastatic potential, it is widely accepted that "carcinoma in situ" should . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Perry J. Pickhardt, MD
pj.pickhardt@hosp.wisc.edu
Department of Radiology
University of Wisconsin Medical School
Madison

Bernard Levin, MD
Department of Gastroenterology
University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
Houston

John H. Bond, MD
Department of Gastroenterology
Minneapolis VA Medical Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Prevalence of Nonpolypoid (Flat and Depressed) Colorectal Neoplasms in Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Adults
, , , , , , , and
JAMA. ;299():1027-1035.
FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTER

Screening for Nonpolypoid Colorectal Neoplasms--Reply
, , and
JAMA. ;299():2743-2744.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Colorectal Cancer Screening With CT Colonography: Key Concepts Regarding Polyp Prevalence, Size, Histology, Morphology, and Natural History
Pickhardt and Kim
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2009;193:40-46.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sensitivity of CT Colonography for Nonpolypoid Colorectal Lesions Interpreted by Human Readers and With Computer-Aided Detection
Park et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2009;193:70-78.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.