You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 299 No. 24, June 25, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (9)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Conflict of Interest
 •Medical Ethics
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Drug Therapy
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Everyone's a Little Bit Biased (Even Physicians)

Daylian M. Cain, PhD; Allan S. Detsky, MD, PhD

JAMA. 2008;299(24):2893-2895.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Medical schools and professional medical associations have developed policies and guidelines in response to increasing concerns over potential conflicts of interest.1 While many physicians agree with these concerns, some view conflict-of-interest policies as affronts to their integrity and an indictment of the ethical conduct of the profession as a whole. These individuals believe that their training as scientists and their devotion to professionalism protects them from external influences that might bias their opinions. However, this view may be based on an incorrect understanding of human psychology. Conflicts of interest are problematic, not only because they are widespread but also because most people incorrectly think that succumbing to them is due to intentional corruption, a problem for only a few bad apples. In this Commentary, we argue that succumbing to a conflict of interest is more likely to result from unintentional bias, . . . [Full Text of this Article]

The Ethical Brain, Post Hoc

Author Affiliations: Yale School of Management, New Haven, Connecticut (Dr Cain); Departments of Health Policy Management and Evaluation and Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Departments of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital and University Health Network, Toronto (Dr Detsky).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTER

Issues Behind Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest
Ronald S. Go
JAMA. 2008;300(18):2120.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Antidote to Bias in Research
Allison
Science 2009;326:522-523.
FULL TEXT  

Does the expert panel at the St Gallen meeting provide an unbiased opinion about the management of women with early breast cancer?
Hietanen
Ann Oncol 2009;20:1749-1751.
FULL TEXT  

The Role of Conflict of Interest in Reporting of Scientific Information
Irwin
Chest 2009;136:253-259.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

How do disclosure policies fail? Let us count the ways
de Melo-Martin and Intemann
FASEB J. 2009;23:1638-1642.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The fallacy of impartiality: competing interest bias in academic publications
Smith et al.
JRSM 2009;102:44-45.
FULL TEXT  

Issues Behind Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest
Go
JAMA 2008;300:2120-2120.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.