You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 299 No. 4, January 30, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Law and Medicine
 •Occupational and Environmental Medicine
 •Public Health, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Contingent Workers and Contingent Health

Risks of a Modern Economy

Kristin J. Cummings, MD, MPH; Kathleen Kreiss, MD

JAMA. 2008;299(4):448-450.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Employment arrangements in which the worker has a nontraditional relationship with the work-site employer have come to be grouped together in recent years as "contingent" work. Throughout the 1970s and 1980s, as employers sought more flexibility, contingent employment arrangements became more common in the United States. From 1969 to 1993, the number of part-time workers nearly doubled, representing a quarter of all growth in the national workforce.1 From 1982 to 1990, employment in temporary agencies increased 10 times faster than did the workforce as a whole.2 During the 1980s, the use of independent contractors in coal mining and of contract company workers in agriculture doubled.3

The use of contingent workers has not been limited to the private sector: by 2006, the federal government was spending an estimated $400 billion per year on contractors.4 Since national data were first collected by the Department . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: Division of Respiratory Disease Studies, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Morgantown, West Virginia.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Community Campaigns, Supply Chains, and Protecting the Health and Well-Being of Workers
Quinlan and Sokas
AJPH 2009;99:S538-S546.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sharps Injuries and Other Blood and Body Fluid Exposures Among Home Health Care Nurses and Aides
Quinn et al.
AJPH 2009;99:S710-S717.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

MacDonald et al. Respond to "Search for Preventable Causes of Cardiovascular Disease"
MacDonald et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2009;169:1426-1427.
FULL TEXT  

A Framework for the Concurrent Consideration of Occupational Hazards and Obesity
Schulte et al.
ANN OCCUP HYG 2008;52:555-566.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.