You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 299 No. 5, February 6, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Research Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Cardiovascular System, Other
 •Quality of Care
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Surgery
 •Surgical Interventions
 •Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Trends in the Use of Percutaneous Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale and Atrial Septal Defect in Adults, 1998-2004

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale/atrial septal defect (PFO/ASD) is perceived as having minimal risk and has been proposed for a broad array of indications.1 The widespread application of this procedure, especially PFO closure, is controversial because of limited data on its efficacy and safety in many settings, including prevention of recurrent cryptogenic stroke.2 We studied trends in the prevalence of PFO/ASD closure in the United States.

Methods

We analyzed data from 1998 through 2004 of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, the largest publicly available all-payer US inpatient database; this stratified sample approximates a 20% sample of US community hospitals. The Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania institutional review board granted an exemption for this study.

The cohort included participants aged 20 years or older with a procedure code from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) designating "Repair of ASD with prosthesis, closed technique" (. . . [Full Text of this Article]

Alexander R. Opotowsky, MD, MPH
alexander.opotowsky@uphs.upenn.edu
Department of Medicine
University of Pennsylvania Medical Center
Philadelphia

Michael J. Landzberg, MD
Department of Medicine
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts

Stephen E. Kimmel, MD, MSCE; Gary D. Webb, MD
Department of Medicine
University of Pennsylvania Medical Center
Philadelphia



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Percutaneous Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale and Atrial Septal Defect
Ravinay Bhindi and Oliver J. Ormerod
JAMA. 2008;299(19):2272.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Percutaneous Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale and Atrial Septal Defect—Reply
Alexander R. Opotowsky, Michael J. Landzberg, and Gary D. Webb
JAMA. 2008;299(19):2272-2273.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Percutaneous patent foramen ovale/atrial septal defect closure: just because we can?
Opotowsky and Webb
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2009;88:1386-1386.
FULL TEXT  

Trends in hospitalizations for adults with congenital heart disease in the u.s.
Opotowsky et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:460-467.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prevalence and Repair of Intraoperatively Diagnosed Patent Foramen Ovale and Association With Perioperative Outcomes and Long-term Survival
Krasuski et al.
JAMA 2009;302:290-297.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of Percutaneous Device Implantation for Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale on Valve Insufficiencies
Wohrle et al.
Circulation 2009;119:3002-3008.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Percutaneous Device Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale for Secondary Stroke Prevention: A Call for Completion of Randomized Clinical Trials A Science Advisory From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association and the American College of Cardiology Foundation The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this science advisory
O'Gara et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:2014-2018.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Percutaneous Device Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale for Secondary Stroke Prevention: A Call for Completion of Randomized Clinical Trials: A Science Advisory From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association and the American College of Cardiology Foundation The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this science advisory.
O'Gara et al.
Circulation 2009;119:2743-2747.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Percutaneous Device Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale in Patients With Presumed Cryptogenic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: The Mayo Clinic Experience
Ford et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2009;2:404-411.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Patent Foramen Ovale in Cryptogenic Stroke: Not to Close
Messe and Kasner
Circulation 2008;118:1999-2004.
FULL TEXT  

Percutaneous Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale and Atrial Septal Defect
Bhindi and Ormerod
JAMA 2008;299:2272-2272.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.