You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 299 No. 7, February 20, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (9)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Medical Practice, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Who Is Accountable for Racial Equity in Health Care?

Jan Blustein, MD, PhD

JAMA. 2008;299(7):814-816.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Racial disparities are a ubiquitous feature of the US medical landscape, with health care delivery substantially segregated by race/ethnicity. Recent evidence from hospitals,1-3 nursing homes,4-5 and physicians' offices6 suggests that those caring for minority patients do not perform as well as those who care for nonminority patients, on average. This evidence is troubling but hardly surprising because the limited resources of those who care for the poor have helped to create and sustain racial disparities. As the United States enters an era of accountability in health care, it is time to consider these familiar circumstances from a new perspective.

De Facto Racial Segregation in US Health Care

De facto racial segregation is a remarkably prevalent feature of US health care delivery. A national study of Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction in 1994 and 1995 showed that the majority of facilities in the United States admitted no black patients during that 2-year period; . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: Wagner Graduate School, New York University and Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Differences in Control of Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes by Race, Ethnicity, and Education: U.S. Trends From 1999 to 2006 and Effects of Medicare Coverage
McWilliams et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2009;150:505-515.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Racial Disparities in Access to Long-Term Care: The Illusive Pursuit of Equity
Smith et al.
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 2008;33:861-881.
ABSTRACT  

So Much to Do, So Little Time: Care for the Socially Disadvantaged and the 15-Minute Visit
Fiscella and Epstein
Arch Intern Med 2008;168:1843-1852.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Race, Gender, and Socioeconomic Disparities in CKD in the United States
Norris and Nissenson
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2008;19:1261-1270.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Is the Ethnic Disparity in CKD a Symptom of Dysfunctional Primary Care in the US?
Wesson
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2008;19:1249-1251.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.