You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 299 No. 7, February 20, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Journalology/ Peer Review/ Authorship
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

To JAMA Peer Reviewers and Authors—Thank You

Phil B. Fontanarosa, MD, MBA; Catherine D. DeAngelis, MD, MPH

JAMA. 2008;299(7):821.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In this issue of JAMA, we are publishing, with our sincere thanks, the names of the peer reviewers who completed manuscript reviews for JAMA in 2007.1 We extend our appreciation to these peer review consultants for their insightful and rigorous critiques, their thoughtful and scholarly recommendations, and their valuable contributions in helping to maintain and enhance the scientific quality of articles published in JAMA.

We also extend our sincere thanks to all authors who submitted research papers, review articles, and other manuscripts for consideration for publication in JAMA. We are grateful to these physician-scientists, medical researchers, clinical investigators, and many other authors who submitted manuscripts for providing JAMA the opportunity to consider their work for publication.

The high quality of papers submitted to JAMA as well as the rigorous nature and timeliness of the peer review process . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: Dr Fontanarosa (phil.fontanarosa@jama-archives.org) is Executive Deputy Editor and Dr DeAngelis is Editor-in-Chief, JAMA.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

JAMA Peer Reviewers in 2007
JAMA. 2008;299(7):822-834.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Update on JAMA-EXPRESS: Rapid Review and Publication
Fontanarosa and DeAngelis
JAMA 2008;300:2920-2921.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.