You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 299 No. 8, February 27, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology
 •Colon Cancer
 •Quality of Care
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Lymph Node Examination Rate, Survival Rate, and Quality of Care in Colon Cancer

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: In their study examining the association of hospital nodal evaluation rates and survival after colectomy for cancer, Dr Wong and colleagues1 concluded that examination of increasing numbers of lymph nodes is not associated with survival at the hospital level and that evaluation of 12 or more lymph nodes is not a useful quality measure.

However, their data actually demonstrate a significant improvement in survival in a key population. Table 3 shows a survival advantage for stage II patients treated at hospitals with high lymph node examination rates (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.96). The patients who would benefit most from having 12 or more nodes examined are stage II patients who have had an inadequate number of lymph nodes examined to confidently deem them free of nodal metastases. These understaged patients would fail to receive the potentially lifesaving benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy.2 When examined in . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Karl Y. Bilimoria, MD; Andrew K. Stewart, MA
American College of Surgeons
Chicago, Illinois

Stephen B. Edge, MD
Department of Surgery
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Buffalo, New York

Clifford Y. Ko, MD, MS, MSHS
cko@mednet.ucla.edu
American College of Surgeons



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Hospital Lymph Node Examination Rates and Survival After Resection for Colon Cancer
Sandra L. Wong, Hong Ji, Brent K. Hollenbeck, Arden M. Morris, Onur Baser, and John D. Birkmeyer
JAMA. 2007;298(18):2149-2154.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTERS

Lymph Node Examination Rate, Survival Rate, and Quality of Care in Colon Cancer
Elke Peters, Iris D. Nagtegaal, Cornelius J. H. van de Velde, and J. Han van Krieken
JAMA. 2008;299(8):896-897.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Lymph Node Examination Rate, Survival Rate, and Quality of Care in Colon Cancer—Reply
Sandra L. Wong and John D. Birkmeyer
JAMA. 2008;299(8):897-898.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Lymph Node Evaluation as a Colon Cancer Quality Measure: A National Hospital Report Card
Bilimoria et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2008;100:1310-1317.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.