You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 300 No. 12, September 24, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Health Agencies Update
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Law and Medicine
 •Medical Ethics
 •Women's Health
 •Women's Health, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

"Conscience" Regulations

Bridget M. Kuehn

JAMA. 2008;300(12):1403.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Controversial regulations proposed by the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) that would allow health care workers and institutions to refuse on religious grounds to perform or refer patients for abortions may go into law this month.

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American Medical Association, and other groups say the regulations may limit women's access to abortion and contraception. Despite this, the agency published the rule in the August 26 Federal Register, starting the clock on a final 30-day comment period prior to becoming law (http://frwebgate5.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/waisgate.cgi?WAISdocID=762017164570+0+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve).

The DHHS removed from the proposed legislation a definition of abortion that included any interference with a fertilized egg, which many groups argued would have legally redefined many forms of contraception as abortion. Despite objections, however, the proposed rule still contains provisions that prevent institutions receiving federal funding from firing or refusing to hire . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.