You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 300 No. 13, October 1, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology
 •Breast Cancer
 •Radiologic Imaging
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Women's Health
 •Women's Health, Other
 •Diagnosis
 •Mammography
 •Ultrasonography
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Ultrasound and Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Dr Berg and colleagues1 provide evidence on the detection of breast cancer using ultrasound as adjunct screening to mammography, using a risk-based selection of participants, many of whom had a personal history of breast cancer. Although the sensitivity of 50% reported for mammography is within the range of sensitivities reported in screening dense breast tissue, this encompassed a broader distribution of breast tissue density categories (including the less dense category D2) than did other studies of ultrasound screening in women with dense breasts.2-3 The incremental cancer detection with ultrasound is important but should be interpreted relative to the moderate sensitivity of mammography reported in this population of women. A recent study of ultrasound screening in women with dense (D3-D4) breasts used blinded review of mammograms from women with ultrasound-detected cancers that had been previously reported as negative; 8 of 33 had abnormalities on mammography correlating with ultrasound-detected . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Nehmat Houssami, MBBS, FAFPHM, PhD
nehmath@med.usyd.edu.au
School of Public Health
University of Sydney
Sydney, Australia

Stefano Ciatto, MD, PhD
Centro per lo Studio e la Prevenzione Oncologica
Florence, Italy



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Combined Screening With Ultrasound and Mammography vs Mammography Alone in Women at Elevated Risk of Breast Cancer
Wendie A. Berg, Jeffrey D. Blume, Jean B. Cormack, Ellen B. Mendelson, Daniel Lehrer, Marcela Böhm-Vélez, Etta D. Pisano, Roberta A. Jong, W. Phil Evans, Marilyn J. Morton, Mary C. Mahoney, Linda Hovanessian Larsen, Richard G. Barr, Dione M. Farria, Helga S. Marques, Karan Boparai, and for the ACRIN 6666 Investigators
JAMA. 2008;299(18):2151-2163.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTERS

Ultrasound and Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening
B. Dale Magee
JAMA. 2008;300(13):1514.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ultrasound and Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening—Reply
Wendie A. Berg and Ellen B. Mendelson
JAMA. 2008;300(13):1515.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.