You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 300 No. 13, October 1, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology
 •Breast Cancer
 •Radiologic Imaging
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Women's Health
 •Women's Health, Other
 •Diagnosis
 •Mammography
 •Ultrasonography
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Ultrasound and Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening—Reply

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In Reply: We agree with Dr Magee that it is important to consider both survival and cost consequences of imaging tests. This is particularly true of breast cancer screening, which involves large numbers of women and repeated annual testing. The cancers seen only with screening ultrasound are nearly all invasive and node-negative at detection. Left undetected, these invasive cancers may spread to axillary nodes prior to diagnosis, worsening the prognosis. Across 7 RCTs of mammography, the decrease in mortality observed parallels reduction in node-positive cancers.1

Drs Houssami and Ciatto point out that our study showed a detection yield from screening ultrasound. The Italian multicenter study of screening ultrasound initially reported a supplemental yield of 4.4 per 1000,2 similar to the 4.2 per 1000 yield we reported. In an update, among 9157 women screened, 166 cancers had been found at initial mammography, and 50 cancers were found only on ultrasound (yield . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Wendie A. Berg, MD, PhD
wendieberg@gmail.com
American Radiology Services
Johns Hopkins Green Spring
Lutherville, Maryland

Ellen B. Mendelson, MD
Feinberg School of Medicine
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Combined Screening With Ultrasound and Mammography vs Mammography Alone in Women at Elevated Risk of Breast Cancer
Wendie A. Berg, Jeffrey D. Blume, Jean B. Cormack, Ellen B. Mendelson, Daniel Lehrer, Marcela Böhm-Vélez, Etta D. Pisano, Roberta A. Jong, W. Phil Evans, Marilyn J. Morton, Mary C. Mahoney, Linda Hovanessian Larsen, Richard G. Barr, Dione M. Farria, Helga S. Marques, Karan Boparai, and for the ACRIN 6666 Investigators
JAMA. 2008;299(18):2151-2163.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTERS

Ultrasound and Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening
B. Dale Magee
JAMA. 2008;300(13):1514.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ultrasound and Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening
Nehmat Houssami and Stefano Ciatto
JAMA. 2008;300(13):1514-1515.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.