You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 300 No. 13, October 1, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Medical Ethics
 •Complementary and Alternative Medicine
 •Critical Care/ Intensive Care Medicine
 •Adult Critical Care
 •Transplantation
 •Transplantation, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Request for Complementary Medicine After Brain Death

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Dr Applbaum and colleagues1 present a case of a request for complementary medicine after determination that death has occurred using brain function criteria. Applbaum analyzed the ethical issues in this case using the method of analytic isolation, but this was not necessary because the ethics of this case are straightforward.

A cadaver is not a patient, making the use of the word in the presentation by the authors and by the ethics consultants in this case conceptually flawed at its core. Cadavers cannot be disconnected from "life support," and the use of such language can promote confusion in the public. The ethical standard of care for a cadaver that is not to be maintained for purposes of obtaining tissues or organs for transplantation is prompt discharge to the hospital morgue—both for public health reasons and to prevent unacceptable opportunity costs that arise when patients are denied or . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Laurence B. McCullough, PhD
mccullou@bcm.edu
Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

A Family's Request for Complementary Medicine After Patient Brain Death
Arthur Isak Applbaum, Jon C. Tilburt, Michael T. Collins, and David Wendler
JAMA. 2008;299(18):2188-2193.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTERS

Request for Complementary Medicine After Brain Death
Erwin J. O. Kompanje
JAMA. 2008;300(13):1517.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Request for Complementary Medicine After Brain Death—Reply
Arthur Isak Applbaum and Jon C. Tilburt
JAMA. 2008;300(13):1517-1518.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.