This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Medical Practice  • Law and Medicine  • Public Health, Other  • Violence and Human Rights  • Violence and Human Rights, Other  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Constitutional Law, Politics, and Public Health

Lawrence Gostin, JD

JAMA. 2008;300(13):1575-1577.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In District of Columbia v Heller, The Supreme Court held, for the first time in its history, that the Second Amendment grants an individual right to possess and use firearms for personal use, which encompasses the right to keep a loaded handgun at home for self-defense. Justice Scalia, writing for a bitterly divided court that split 5 to 4 along ideological lines, said that the Second Amendment "surely elevates above all other interests the right of law-abiding, responsible citizens to use arms in defense of hearth and home."¹

The court thereby struck down a Washington, DC, law that bars registration of a handgun because, Scalia said, it prohibits a class of arms that "Americans overwhelmingly choose for the lawful purpose of self-defense." The court similarly invalidated Washington, DC’s, requirement that any lawful firearm in the home be disassembled or bound by a trigger lock because it makes . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Parsing the Second Amendment

Author Affiliation: O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?