You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 300 No. 14, October 8, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Bacterial Infections
 •Critical Care/ Intensive Care Medicine
 •Adult Critical Care
 •Pediatrics
 •Neonatology and Infant Care
 •Screening
 •Drug Therapy
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Infectious Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Reductions in Incidence of Invasive Group B Streptococcal Disease in the United States—Reply

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In Reply: Both letters question whether prevention of early-onset group B streptococcal disease by intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis resulted in important disease reductions. From 1993 to 2005, the Active Bacterial Core surveillance (ABCs) documented an 80% decline in invasive early-onset group B streptococcal disease incidence from 1.66 to 0.35 cases per 1000 live births.1 This coincided with widespread uptake of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis following issuance of consensus perinatal group B streptococcal disease prevention guidelines in 1996 and a guidelines update in 2002.

Dr Mitchell is correct that the incidence decline (0.13 cases/1000 live births) following the 2002 guidelines was small. This is not surprising because intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis was already widely used in the 1999-2001 baseline period. Instead, what is notable is that the decline in 2003-2005 follows several years of plateau and that it is of the magnitude predicted when the 2002 guidelines were issued.2 The 2002 recommendation of universal . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Christina Phares, PhD
ctp7@cdc.gov

Anne Schuchat, MD; Stephanie Schrag, DPhil
National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Atlanta, Georgia



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Reductions in Incidence of Invasive Group B Streptococcal Disease in the United States
Clyde Mitchell
JAMA. 2008;300(14):1649.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reductions in Incidence of Invasive Group B Streptococcal Disease in the United States
Ralph K. H. Nanan, Gurvinder Singh, and Alison Poulton
JAMA. 2008;300(14):1649-1650.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.