You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 300 No. 14, October 8, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Academic Medical Centers
 •Caring for the Uninsured and Underinsured
 •Quality of Care
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Comparisons of Safety-Net and Non–Safety-Net Hospitals

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: In their study comparing change in quality of care between safety-net and non–safety-net hospitals, Dr Werner and colleagues1 raised important points about the design of pay-for-performance programs linked to publicly reported quality measures and the risk of unintended negative consequences to financially strapped public hospitals. I agree with their caveats about zero sum financial incentives.

However, I take exception to their statement that "the quality of care at these [safety-net] hospitals is lower than that delivered at other hospitals." The New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation (HHC), the largest US public hospital system, performs above the national average on nearly all of the current quality measures by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). For example, for the period April 2006 through March 2007, HHC performed better than the national average on measures of heart attack care (87.0 vs 78.6), heart failure care (94.0 vs . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Alan D. Aviles, JD
alan.aviles@nychhc.org
New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation
New York, New York



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Comparison of Change in Quality of Care Between Safety-Net and Non–Safety-Net Hospitals
Rachel M. Werner, L. Elizabeth Goldman, and R. Adams Dudley
JAMA. 2008;299(18):2180-2187.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTERS

Comparisons of Safety-Net and Non–Safety-Net Hospitals
Gene Marie O’Connell
JAMA. 2008;300(14):1651.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparisons of Safety-Net and Non–Safety-Net Hospitals
Jeffrey L. Williams
JAMA. 2008;300(14):1651-1652.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparisons of Safety-Net and Non–Safety-Net Hospitals—Reply
Rachel M. Werner, L. Elizabeth Goldman, and R. Adams Dudley
JAMA. 2008;300(14):1652.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.