You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 300 No. 14, October 8, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Academic Medical Centers
 •Caring for the Uninsured and Underinsured
 •Quality of Care
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Comparisons of Safety-Net and Non–Safety-Net Hospitals

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: In their study of safety-net and non–safety-net hospitals, Dr Werner and colleagues1 assert that both quality of care and the rate of improvement in safety-net hospitals are lower than in non–safety-net hospitals. I believe there are flaws in the study methodology and findings.

The authors identified a group of 928 "safety-net hospitals" based solely on the percentage of patients insured by Medicaid. This overly broad definition assesses small rural and large urban teaching hospitals equally even though they share few common characteristics. For example, rural hospitals do not operate large trauma centers characteristic of their urban counterparts, and they experience far smaller inpatient censuses. Yet the authors lump these dissimilar facilities together and claim that, because this ill-defined group is overrepresented in the bottom decile of performance and underrepresented in the top decile, all safety-net hospitals must be performing poorly.

The most recent data from CMS's Hospital . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Gene Marie O’Connell, RN, MS
ssiegel@naph.org
San Francisco General Hospital and Medical Center
San Francisco, California



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Comparison of Change in Quality of Care Between Safety-Net and Non–Safety-Net Hospitals
Rachel M. Werner, L. Elizabeth Goldman, and R. Adams Dudley
JAMA. 2008;299(18):2180-2187.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTERS

Comparisons of Safety-Net and Non–Safety-Net Hospitals
Alan D. Aviles
JAMA. 2008;300(14):1650-1651.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparisons of Safety-Net and Non–Safety-Net Hospitals
Jeffrey L. Williams
JAMA. 2008;300(14):1651-1652.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparisons of Safety-Net and Non–Safety-Net Hospitals—Reply
Rachel M. Werner, L. Elizabeth Goldman, and R. Adams Dudley
JAMA. 2008;300(14):1652.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.