 |
 |

Comparisons of Safety-Net and Non–Safety-Net Hospitals—Reply
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
In Reply: Mr Aviles and Ms OConnell take exception with our finding that hospitals with a higher percentage of Medicaid patients have lower baseline performance on average than other hospitals. We do not suggest that all safety-net hospitals have low performance, but that on average baseline hospital performance is lower if the percentage of patients insured by Medicaid is higher. This finding is consistent with numerous other studies that have found that a hospital's payer mix, its ownership (ie, public hospitals), and the race and socioeconomic status of its patients influence hospital performance1-3 and suggests that safety-net hospitals face barriers to performing well on these measures.
We agree with OConnell that safety-net hospitals are a heterogeneous group. For this reason, we did not categorize hospitals as safety-net or non–safety-net hospitals, as OConnell suggests. Rather, we document a continuous relationship between the percentage of patients insured by Medicaid at a hospital . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Rachel M. Werner, MD, PhD
rwerner@mail.med.upenn.edu Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
L. Elizabeth Goldman, MD, MCR
Department of Medicine
R. Adams Dudley, MD, MBA
Institute for Health Policy Studies University of California, San Francisco
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED LETTERS
Comparisons of Safety-Net and Non–Safety-Net Hospitals
Alan D. Aviles
JAMA. 2008;300(14):1650-1651.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Comparisons of Safety-Net and Non–Safety-Net Hospitals
Gene Marie OConnell
JAMA. 2008;300(14):1651.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Comparisons of Safety-Net and Non–Safety-Net Hospitals
Jeffrey L. Williams
JAMA. 2008;300(14):1651-1652.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|