You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 300 No. 14, October 8, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Book and Media Reviews
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Medical Ethics
 •Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care
 •End-of-life Care/ Palliative Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?


Choosing to Die: Elective Death and Multiculturalism

Medically Assisted Death

Choosing to Die: Elective Death and Multiculturalism
By C. G. Prado
224 pp, $85.50
New York, NY, Cambridge University Press, 2008
ISBN-13: 978-0-5218-7484-7
Medically Assisted Death
By Robert Young
260 pp, $90.95
New York, NY, Cambridge University Press, 2007
ISBN-13: 978-0-5218-8024-4

JAMA. 2008;300(14):1703-1704.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Two books on virtually the same important but touchy topic, both closely reasoned, each published by the same press at about the same time, and each written by a professor of philosophy (Prado is Canadian, Young Australian) who advocates (Prado more cautiously than Young) for rational suicide—these are the similarities. But the differences between them are plain. Prado's book is a pedantic and somewhat arcane academic treatise; Young's is a book of relevance to clinicians, particularly clinical bioethicists.

On the first page of his preface, Prado recognizes the difficulties he faces. He describes presenting the substance of his first 2 chapters at a recent end-of-life conference. The participants were mostly clinicians. As he recalls, "I regret that the comments and questions about the material presented made it clear that few in the audience thought what I had to say was relevant to their work" (p ix). Therefore, he tells readers . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Ernle W. D. Young, PhD, Reviewer
Department of Medicine (Biomedical Ethics) (Emeritus)
Stanford University
ernleyoung@earthlink.net



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.