You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 300 No. 14, October 8, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Book and Media Reviews
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care
 •Patient-Physician Communication
 •End-of-life Care/ Palliative Medicine
 •World Health
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?


End-of-Life Communication in the ICU: A Global Perspective

Edited by David W. Crippen
180 pp, $79.95
New York, NY, Springer Science-Business Media, 2008
ISBN-13:978-0-3877-2965-7

JAMA. 2008;300(14):1704-1705.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

End-of-Life Communication in the ICU: A Global Perspective is the creative brainchild of David W. Crippen, with contributions from the Critical Care Medicine-List, an Internet community of intensive care practitioners. Dr Crippen queried members of the global medical village about communication issues that impact treatment care plans for patients at the end of life in intensive care units. The book chronicles a wide range of views from practitioners, ethicists, historians, scientists, health care administrators, and consumers from around the world and examines how these interactions affect global health care delivery. The book is loosely organized into brief chapters that capture multinational perspectives on end-of-life care, resource management in critical care, and ethics. Chapters vary considerably in their writing style, degree of scholarship, and focus on communication.

Although universal agreement seems likely that a shared decision-making approach is desirable at the end of life, and despite increasing openness and published guidelines, . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Elaine C. Meyer, PhD, RN, Reviewer
Institute for Professionalism & Ethical Practice
Children's Hospital Boston
Department of Psychology
Harvard Medical School
Boston, Massachusetts
elaine.meyer@tch.harvard.edu



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.