You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 300 No. 15, October 15, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Bacterial Infections
 •Venous Thromboembolism
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Radiologic Imaging
 •Renal Diseases
 •Dialysis
 •Ultrasonography
 •Hematology/ Hematologic Malignancies
 •Hematology, Other
 •Infectious Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Femoral vs Jugular Venous Catheterization for Short-term Dialysis Access

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: In a randomized trial of femoral vs jugular venous catheterization for short-term dialysis access, Dr Parienti and colleagues1 concluded that jugular venous catheterization resulted in more mechanical complications, specifically hematomas. Additionally, they found no difference in the overall rate of catheter colonization, although this varied based on body mass index.

The authors noted that "[t]he mechanical complication rate reported for the jugular group might be overestimated" since very few catheters were placed under ultrasound guidance. However, the catheter colonization rate may also be overstated for the jugular position for the same reason. In a large randomized trial of ultrasound vs the landmark technique for insertion of jugular venous catheters, significantly fewer infections were found in the ultrasound group, possibly due to the fewer skin punctures required when ultrasound was used.2 The results of the study by Parienti et al may not be applicable to centers where ultrasound . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Lewis Eisen, MD
leisen@gmail.com
Department of Critical Care Medicine
Montefiore Medical Center
Bronx, New York



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Femoral vs Jugular Venous Catheterization and Risk of Nosocomial Events in Adults Requiring Acute Renal Replacement Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Jean-Jacques Parienti, Marina Thirion, Bruno Mégarbane, Bertrand Souweine, Abdelali Ouchikhe, Andrea Polito, Jean-Marie Forel, Sophie Marqué, Benoît Misset, Norair Airapetian, Claire Daurel, Jean-Paul Mira, Michel Ramakers, Damien du Cheyron, Xavier Le Coutour, Cédric Daubin, Pierre Charbonneau, and for Members of the Cathedia Study Group
JAMA. 2008;299(20):2413-2422.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTERS

Femoral vs Jugular Venous Catheterization for Short-term Dialysis Access
Saravanan Balamuthusamy, Ivo Lukitch, and Eric E. Simon
JAMA. 2008;300(15):1760-1761.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Femoral vs Jugular Venous Catheterization for Short-term Dialysis Access—Reply
Jean-Jacques Parienti
JAMA. 2008;300(15):1761-1762.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.